跳至主要内容
VKAFF
本页面仅提供英文版本。

Reference

Singapore Flavouring Regulations

A clause-by-clause reference

Instruments checked 13 September 2026. Singapore Statutes Online showed the Sale of Food Act 1973 and the Food Regulations as current as at that date. Retrieval dates for each section are in the citation note below.

Singapore does not permit flavourings from a positive list. Regulation 22(1) of the Food Regulations defines a flavouring agent by what it does, and what the regulation binds hard is the carrier and the blacklist: twelve permitted solvents, and sixteen substances prohibited outright rather than capped.

This page sets out each governing clause in turn: a plain-English sentence, the wording of the instrument itself, and the citation.

Checked 13 September 2026: the last amendment to the Food Regulations is still S 92/2025, in force 30 January 2026, and no instrument made under the Sale of Food Act appears in Singapore's 2026 Subsidiary Legislation Supplement; SFA's list of permitted food additives is still the 31 May 2024 edition. Singapore's compliance baseline for a flavouring did not move in 2026. The one Singapore document that did change sits just outside the window: SFA's Guidance Information on Requirements for Food Additives was revised on 19 January 2026, and the revision note records that it was “Updated to reflect new technological function included in the Food Regulations, to include general information related to the assessment of new food additive and new additive derived from precision fermentation, and to include FAQs”. That guidance is expressly not legally binding. Section 10 sets the region against it and section 11 lists the 2026 changes abroad that customers are asking about.

Section 01

What a flavouring agent is

Singapore defines a flavouring agent by function rather than by a list of approved substances, so the compliance question is never whether a substance appears on a Singapore register.

In these Regulations, “flavouring agent” means any wholesome substance that when added or applied to food is capable of imparting taste or odour, or both, to a food.

Food Regulations (Sale of Food Act 1973), reg 22(1)

In principle, SFA has no objection to the use of flavouring substances that have been evaluated and endorsed by recognised international bodies such as the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), the Flavour and Extract Manufacturers’ Association (FEMA), or the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), under good manufacturing practice (GMP), provided that the flavouring preparations do not contain any of the prohibited substances listed under Regulation 22(7) of the Food Regulations.

Singapore Food Agency, Food Additives Permitted under the Singapore Food Regulations (as at 31 May 2024), Section B, Note (2), p 29

The SFA document that carries that note is guidance, and says so of itself: “This guidance document is not legally binding, and should be read together with the Food Regulations” (same document, preamble, p 1). An accommodation for internationally evaluated substances is not a statutory permitted list, and there is no product-level approval or registration of individual flavourings in Singapore.

Section 02

Permitted solvents

The binding list in regulation 22 is a list of solvents, not of flavour substances, and it is exhaustive: an essence carried in anything else may not be imported, sold or used.

No person shall import, sell, advertise, manufacture, consign or deliver any natural or synthetic flavouring essence or extract which is contained in a solvent other than a permitted solvent, namely, 1,3‑propanediol, benzyl alcohol, beta-cyclodextrin, diacetin, diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, ethyl alcohol, glycerol, isopropyl alcohol, propylene glycol, triacetin and water.

Food Regulations, reg 22(2)

The permitted solvents referred to in paragraph (2) other than water shall conform with the British Pharmacopoeia standard.

Food Regulations, reg 22(3)

Twelve solvents, eleven of them at pharmacopoeial grade. This is why a solvent or carrier declaration naming the solvent system is the first document to ask a supplier for, and why a carrier outside the twelve is not a specification detail but a compliance failure.

Section 03

Prohibited flavouring substances

Sixteen named substances are prohibited outright as flavouring agents, with no permitted level, and the prohibition follows the substance into synthetic essences supplied for food manufacture.

The use of coumarin, tonka bean, safrole, sassafras oil, dihydrosafrole, isosafrole, agaric acid, nitrobenzene, dulcamara, pennyroyal oil, oil of tansy, rue oil, birch tar oil, cade oil, volatile bitter almond oil containing hydrocyanic acid and male fern as flavouring agents is prohibited.

Food Regulations, reg 22(7)

No person shall import, sell, advertise, manufacture, expose or offer for sale, consign or deliver with a view to it being used in the preparation of food for human consumption, any synthetic flavouring essence or extract which contains any of the prohibited substances specified in paragraph (7).

Food Regulations, reg 22(10)

Reading a parts-per-million ceiling into this clause is the commonest error made by buyers working from European or American practice. Regulation 22(7) is a prohibition, not a maximum level, so a coumarin or safrole figure that would be lawful elsewhere has no application in Singapore.

Section 04

Natural flavouring essences and extracts

In Singapore “natural” has a regulatory meaning tied to the plant the essence is named after, and “synthetic” is defined by the origin of the flavouring principle rather than by how closely it resembles anything.

Natural flavouring agents shall include natural flavouring essences, spices and condiments.

Food Regulations, reg 22(5)

Natural flavouring essences or extracts shall be preparations in any permitted solvent or any combination of permitted solvents, with or without sweeteners other than sweetening agents, permitted colouring matter or chemical preservatives, of sapid or odoriferous principles, or both, derived from a plant after which the flavouring extract or essence is named.

Food Regulations, reg 22(6)

Synthetic flavouring essences or extracts shall include any artificial flavour or imitation flavour which may resemble the sapid or odoriferous principles of an aromatic plant, fruit or vegetable or any other food, except that the flavouring principle shall be derived in whole, or in part, from either chemical synthesis or any other sources that does not involve extraction or isolation therefrom of the sapid or odoriferous principles present in an aromatic plant, fruit or vegetable or any other food.

Food Regulations, reg 22(9)

Two consequences follow for a specification. A natural essence must be in a permitted solvent (section 2 above), and it must be derived from the plant it is named after, which is a sourcing statement a supplier either can or cannot make.

Section 05

Flavour enhancers are a separate closed list

Regulation 23 governs flavour enhancers, and unlike regulation 22 it is a closed positive list: anything not named in it may not be used.

No person shall import, sell, advertise, manufacture, consign or deliver any flavour enhancer for use in food intended for human consumption other than: (a) ethyl maltol; (b) L-glutamic acid, mono-sodium L-glutamate, monopotassium L-glutamate, calcium di‑L‑glutamate, monoammonium L-glutamate and magnesium di-L-glutamate; (c) Inosinic acid, guanylic acid, di-sodium 5’‑inosinate … (d) L-cysteine; (e) L-theanine in the following foods at a level not exceeding 1000 ppm … (f) L-theanine in salt substitutes at a level not exceeding 15,000 ppm.

Food Regulations, reg 23(2)

No person shall import, sell, advertise, manufacture, consign or deliver any article of food intended for human consumption containing a flavour enhancer other than a permitted flavour enhancer specified in paragraph (2).

Food Regulations, reg 23(5)

Regulation 22 contains no equivalent of regulation 23(5). That asymmetry is the whole answer to “does Singapore have a positive list for flavourings?”: it has one for enhancers and not for flavourings, and carrying the enhancer rule across to flavourings produces the wrong compliance test in both directions. The L-theanine limits entered regulation 23 by S 425/2024, in force 31 May 2024.

Section 06

Labelling: the generic term and the allergen carry-over rule

A flavouring may be declared on a Singapore label by a generic term with a fixed set of qualifiers, but since 30 January 2026 an allergen carried into a food through a flavouring may not hide behind that generic term.

11. Any flavouring — Flavour or flavouring, qualified by the words “natural”, “nature identical” or “artificial”, or a combination of any of these words, if applicable

Food Regulations, First Schedule item 11, as amended by S 92/2025 with effect from 30 January 2026

where any food or ingredient mentioned in sub‑paragraph (ea) is carried over from an ingredient into a finished food product, the food or ingredient mentioned in that sub‑paragraph (as the case may be) must be specified by its appropriate designation, but not by the generic term for it in the second column of the First Schedule

Food Regulations, reg 5(4)(b)(vii), inserted by S 92/2025 with effect from 30 January 2026

a list of ingredients containing the appropriate designation of each ingredient (other than any processing aid) … “appropriate designation” means a name or description (being a specific and not a generic name or description) that indicates the true nature of the ingredient or constituent to which it is applied except as provided in the First Schedule

Food Regulations, reg 5(4)(b)

The eight allergen classes that trigger regulation 5(4)(b)(vii) are set out in reg 5(4)(ea): cereals containing gluten, crustacea, eggs, fish, peanuts and soybeans, milk including lactose, tree nuts, and sulphites at 10 mg/kg or more. The practical effect of the 2026 amendment is that a supplier's written allergen declaration becomes the buyer's labelling evidence rather than a courtesy document.

Section 07

Licensing and registration

Licensing in Singapore attaches to the business, not to the flavouring: the Sale of Food Act licenses non-retail food businesses, and the Singapore Food Agency separately registers importers of processed food.

A person must not carry on a non‑retail food business except in accordance with a licence issued to the person by the Director‑General under this Part.

Sale of Food Act 1973, s 21

(h) the processing or packing of herbs or spices for the purpose of sale to wholesalers or retail food businesses, or for export; (i) manufacturing or preparing (including by blending and packing) dry mix products such as cake mix, drinking chocolate, tea bags and powdered soup for sale to wholesalers or retail food businesses, or for export

Sale of Food Act 1973, s 2F(2)

Section 2F(2)'s list does not name flavour compounding. Confirm the classification of a flavour house with the Singapore Food Agency. Separately, the import instrument that covers a flavouring is the Registration to Import Processed Food Products and Food Appliances, listed by the agency as free with a one working day processing time; the agency's own two pages disagree on its validity period, one describing the registration as consignment-based and the other as annual. That conflict was unresolved at the retrieval date. Confirm the validity period with the agency.

Section 08

Halal certification

Only one body may issue a halal certificate in Singapore, certification is voluntary, and a flavouring sits in the highest halal-risk tier, which is the tier that requires a certificate rather than a questionnaire.

Under the Administration of Muslim Law Act (AMLA), MUIS is vested with the sole legal powers to issue Halal certificates in Singapore.

Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura, Halal / About, on the Administration of Muslim Law Act s 88A

Established in 1978, MUIS Halal Certification is voluntary.

Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura, Halal / About (page last updated 21 February 2025)

(c) High — Halal certificates marks from MUIS and/or MUIS-recognised Halal certification bodies

MUIS Halal Certification Conditions, Version 4.1, clause 3.5

Contain flavouring, gelatine or meat and its derivatives

MUIS Halal Certification Conditions, Version 4.1, Annex A, definition of the High ingredient tier, p 30

For a buyer holding halal certification, that tier is the operative fact: a flavouring cannot be substantiated with a specification sheet or a supplier questionnaire, and needs a halal certificate from MUIS or from a certification body MUIS recognises. Certificates are time-limited, so verify the certificate and its expiry at the MUIS halal establishments directory rather than accepting a copy of a PDF.

Section 09

Codex CXG 66-2008 definitions

Codex Alimentarius supplies the international definitions that Singapore's regulation does not, and the two sets do not line up in one important respect.

Flavourings are products that are added to food to impart, modify, or enhance the flavour of food (with the exception of flavour enhancers considered as food additives under the Codex Class Names and the International Numbering System for Food Additives - CAC/GL 36-1989). Flavourings do not include substances that have an exclusively sweet, sour, or salty taste (e.g. sugar, vinegar, and table salt). Flavourings may consist of flavouring substances, natural flavouring complexes, thermal process flavourings or smoke flavourings and mixtures of them and may contain non-flavouring food ingredients (Section 2.3) within the conditions as referred to in 3.5. They are not intended to be consumed as such.

Codex Alimentarius, CAC/GL 66-2008, clause 2.2

Natural flavouring substances are flavouring substances obtained by physical processes that may result in unavoidable but unintentional changes in the chemical structure of the components of the flavouring (e.g. distillation and solvent extraction), or by enzymatic or microbiological processes, from material of plant or animal origin. Such material may be unprocessed, or processed for human consumption by traditional food-preparation processes (e.g. drying, torrefaction (roasting) and fermentation). This means substances that have been identified / detected in a natural material of animal or vegetable origin.

Codex Alimentarius, CAC/GL 66-2008, clause 2.2.1.1

Synthetic flavouring substances are flavouring substances formed by chemical synthesis.

Codex Alimentarius, CAC/GL 66-2008, clause 2.2.1.2

The use of flavourings is justified only where they impart or modify flavour to food, provided that such use does not mislead the consumer about the nature or quality of food.

Codex Alimentarius, CAC/GL 66-2008, clause 3.3

CAC/GL 66-2008 runs to three pages and its full definition set is: flavour (2.1), flavourings (2.2), flavouring substances (2.2.1), natural flavouring substances (2.2.1.1), synthetic flavouring substances (2.2.1.2), natural flavouring complexes (2.2.2), smoke flavourings (2.2.3) and non-flavouring food ingredients (2.3). Read against that list, the guideline defines no “nature identical” category and no “artificial” category. Singapore's First Schedule item 11 permits “nature identical” as a label qualifier, which is a labelling permission rather than a Codex definition, and the two should not be cited as though they were the same thing.

Section 10

The region against Singapore: Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia

Singapore did not move in 2026, but three of its neighbours did, and a flavouring lawful here still has to clear their rules. The dates below are the ones a supply plan turns on.

Clause 3 Manufacturers or Importers of Foods for sale … can sell the former products, but not exceed two years from the date of this notification come into force.

Thailand, Notification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 468) B.E. 2568 (2025), Re: prescribing the principle, conditions, methods and proportion of food additives (No. 4), Clause 3 (Thai FDA unofficial English translation)

2. Peraturan-Peraturan ini mula berkuat kuasa pada 1 Mac 2027.

Malaysia, Peraturan-Peraturan Makanan (Pindaan) (No. 3) 2026, P.U. (A) 298, reg 1(2)

Tạm ngưng hiệu lực áp dụng cho đến khi … có hiệu lực thi hành … Nghị định số 46/2026/NĐ-CP ngày 26 tháng 01 năm 2026 … 15/2018/NĐ-CP ngày 02 tháng 02 năm 2018 … tiếp tục có hiệu lực

Vietnam, Nghị quyết số 15/2026/NQ-CP of 6 April 2026, Điều 1 and Điều 2
MarketInstrumentWhat it doesDate that bites
SingaporeFood Regulations, as amended by S 92/2025Allergen carry-over may not be declared by the First Schedule generic termIn force 30 January 2026; nothing gazetted since
ThailandNotification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 468) B.E. 2568 (2025)Replaces Annexes I and II of the food-additive rules, with a two-year sell-through for product already approvedIn force 12 December 2025; sell-through closes 12 December 2027
ThailandNotification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 461) B.E. 2568 (2025)Solvents used in extraction for food production, the Thai counterpart to reg 22(2)Gazetted 2 September 2025
MalaysiaPeraturan-Peraturan Makanan (Pindaan) (No. 3) 2026, P.U. (A) 298Bars import or sale of food not prepared at premises running a food-safety assurance programme recognised by Malaysia's Ministry of HealthIn operation 1 March 2027
MalaysiaPeraturan-Peraturan Makanan (Pindaan) (No. 2) 2026, P.U. (A) 221Rewrites the Fifth Schedule A nutrient-claim conditions, including the trans-fat-free claimIn operation 16 December 2026
VietnamNghị định 46/2026/NĐ-CP, suspended by Nghị quyết 15/2026/NQ-CPWould replace Decree 15/2018, but is suspended, so Nghị định 15/2018/NĐ-CP still governs registration, self-declaration and imported-food checksNo operative date; suspended until the amended Food Safety Law and its guiding decree take effect
IndonesiaPP 42/2024, Pasal 160Micro and small transition ends; BPJPH says mandatory halal applies from the next day17 October 2026, obligation from 18 October 2026
Dated obligations in the region as at 13 September 2026, against a Singapore baseline that did not move

Notes on the table. Thailand's Notification (No. 461) B.E. 2568 (2025), gazetted on 2 September 2025, concerns solvents used in extraction for food production, the Thai counterpart to Singapore's permitted-solvent list. Confirm the Malaysian and Thai sugar-tax rates against the applicable instruments. And Malaysia's sugar-content grading label is a closed public consultation, not law: the draft regulation 18BA was consulted on to 4 July 2026 and nothing has been gazetted. And Vietnam's row is a suspension rather than a gate: Nghị định 46/2026/NĐ-CP has no operative date, because Nghị quyết 15/2026/NQ-CP suspends it until the amended Food Safety Law and its guiding decree take effect, which leaves Nghị định 15/2018/NĐ-CP in force.

Section 11

Changes abroad in 2026, which are not Singapore law

Four 2026 movements outside Singapore reach a Singapore manufacturer through customer specifications and export markets rather than through SFA. None of these instruments is Singapore law and none changes anything on this page.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is proposing to require the submission of generally recognized as safe (GRAS) notices for the use of a human or animal food substance purported to be GRAS under the conditions of its intended use under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

US Federal Register, 91 FR 51834 (11 August 2026), Summary

Either electronic or written comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by December 9, 2026.

US Federal Register, 91 FR 51834 (11 August 2026), Dates

(a) 1 July 2029 for food categories 1.7. (Cheese and cheese products), 8. (Meat), 9.2. (Processed fish and fishery products including crustaceans and molluscs), 9.3. (Fish roe) and their corresponding sub-categories; (b) 1 July 2026 for all other food categories.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2067, Article 2(1)

(i) Generally Recognised as Safe (GRAS) lists of flavouring substances published by the Flavour and Extract Manufacturers’ Association of the United States from 1960 to 2024 (edition 31);

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 1.1.2—2(3)(a)(i), as substituted by Amendment No. 249 (commenced 30 April 2026)

Four readings, in plain words. The United States has PROPOSED, not made, a rule converting voluntary GRAS notification into a mandatory one, with comments open to 9 December 2026; FDA's own impact analysis counts 1,740 association-expert-panel GRAS substances in scope, the category that holds FEMA-evaluated flavourings. The European Union added two flavouring substances to its Union list on 26 January 2026, FL No 16.136 by Regulation (EU) 2026/172 and hesperetin dihydrochalcone, FL No 16.137, by Regulation (EU) 2026/175 at not more than 10 mg/Kg in each of fourteen categories, while the same Regulation 2026/172 corrected four wrong CAS numbers that had been sitting in the list. The EU smoke flavouring phase-out passed its first hard date on 1 July 2026 for every food category except cheese, meat, processed fish and fish roe, which run to 1 July 2029. And the Australia New Zealand Code moved its reference edition of the FEMA GRAS list from edition 30 to edition 31 on 30 April 2026, which is why FEMA GRAS status remains the practical international currency for a flavouring permission. None of this alters what SFA requires, and this page states the Singapore position only.

Section 12

How to cite this page

Suggested citation, with the retrieval date that applies to every clause quoted above:

VKA, “Singapore Flavouring Regulations: a clause-by-clause reference”, vkaff.com, retrieved 13 September 2026. https://vkaff.com/reference/singapore-flavouring-regulations

This page is a reading of the instruments named in it, not legal advice. Every clause quoted was retrieved from the publisher listed in Sources on 12 September 2026, except the Sixteenth Schedule text and its amendment annotation, which were re-read on 13 September 2026; the dated material in sections 10 and 11 rests on the primary sources listed against it. Singapore Statutes Online showed the Act and the Regulations as current as at 13 September 2026.

Sources

Related reading